Trivandrum, India (INS News) — The world renowned United States based philosopher and linguist Professor Noam Chosky who developed the concept of transformational grammar embodying his theories about the relationship between language and mind and an underlying universal structure of language.
His ideas have influenced psychologists concerned with language. Critic of Imperialism Professor Noam Chosky predicts that an art of co-ordinating things to achieve best result is not effectively carried out in related with the existing policy of globalization which India follows, will result in doubling poverty in Subcontinent.
No country in the world especially United States have released from the harmful clutches of globalization. The more ascending of haves and the more descending of have-nots is the final outcome of liberalisation. Giving a fair example Chomsky presenting the sad state of affairs occurred due to the globalization in Mexico. After 1995 the ill effect of globalization had take its toll in Mexico where the income of salaried workers had fallen to 25% and that of self-employed by 40%.
Escalation of massive capital investment is the wide propaganda of pro-globalization The actual statistic figure the ascending of investment rested to few American companies. In a nutshell American companies exploited maximum labour by minimum wages. The picture is around 40 people become in poverty line. Globalization only benefited a section of societies in various countries including United States.
This enabled to widen the gap between the haves and have-nots and this would lead to unrest among the underprivileged. Mexico witnessed highest rate of poverty with in the span of 10 years due to the liberalisation.
Capital investment,though, intended for a better economy. But this open doors to the Imperialist to enter in power politics and in other fields in the country with out any hindrances. Assessing the Living Index of India, Noam Chosky predicts dark future in the country.
The living Index during the period of 1996-97 was 7.8% which descended to 5.2% in 2000-01. In India a wide spread propaganda exist that the country had advanced in trade sector. But it didn’t explain how far the involvement of farmers and small scale industries in the advanced trade sector.
Agriculture and small scale Industries become non-profitable. India being proud of self-sufficient in food sector, deliberately forgotten the prevalent 40% poverty in the country compared to the other nations in the world.
Narasimha Rao, former Prime Minister of India, the architect behind the implementation of liberalisation, quoted recently a change in their policies of globalization is highly inevitable, bounding humanitarian concepts. But his followers are not keen in the subject matter of a positive amendment in the policy of liberalisation. Bharatia Janata Party was the arch critic of liberalisation while they are in opposition. Now the Union Government headed by Bharatia Janata Party is the forerunner for the widespread implementation of liberalisation.
Indian National Congress the opposition party in Parliament had shown some leniency towards the liberalisation. Arch critics in the opposition have no audacity to implement their views whenever they assume power, is the common phenomena in political circle, which the people of India witnesses since decades. The people have to join hands to oppose such type of explorations. The harmful effects of globalization had brought about unity among people at the grass root level.
In India there exists a selected peaceful path followed by last generation for freedom struggle followed by for the self sufficient in food sector. This path itself won the respect even before the Imperialists, which we have to uppermost level.
The farmers strength of unity shown by boycotting palm-oil due to reluctant attitude taken by the government towards the important policy of palm-oil, is a timely reaction. Professor Noam Chosky imagine such type of timely reactions against the explication of liberalisation. The world will have a good future only if there is a timely reaction against the explications of big powers.